The scene of the Last Supper, which portrays Christ’s Last Supper with his followers and disciples, was painted during the Early Renaissance period by Andrea del Castagno and during the High Renaissance period by Leonardo da Vinci. Although they both share the same subject matter, and they were painted to encourage the monks and nuns “to see that their daily gatherings for meals were almost a sacramental act rooted in biblical tradition” (Stokstad p.614), in Leonardo’s work we see the start of the “dynamic unity” of the High Renaissance, which is lacking in Castagno’s work.
Dynamic
unity, which was a characteristic of High Renaissance artwork, involved
compositions in sweeping arcs that were energized with figures in a variety of
poses and gestures. In Leonardo’s
painting we can see the dynamic figures of Christ’s disciples that are reacting
to the news of Jesus’s announcement that one of them will betray them. We can see that the figures have been
individualized with different expressions and clothing and hairstyles. Some of the bodies (third man from the right
and fourth man from the left) are shown reaching over to speak in confidence to
another figure, while others are twisting their bodies and necks to listen to
the others talking around them. The
elongated lines of the bodies gives a sense of movement and tension to the
figures, and the bodies also overlap into each other’s space, which also helps
to create flow and movement of the eye within each group of figures and helps move
the eye to the next group.
In
comparison in Castagno’s depiction of the “Last Supper” the figures of the
disciples don’t seem as dynamic. Most of
the figures, except for St. John who is asleep with his head on the table, are
sitting upright and somewhat rigid and solemn.
The gestures of the hands and body are very contained compared to the
figures in Leonardo’s painting of the “Last Supper”, they do not extend very
much into the space of the figures near them.
There isn’t the dynamic placement of the bodies or the exaggerated
expressions of the men at the table, which gave a feeling of tension and
excitement to Leonardo’s work. Looking
at Castagno’s figures, they are fairly evenly divided into their own spaces,
except for Judas by himself on the one side of the table and the figure of
Christ, who’s triangular shaped body seems to take up a little more space than
the rest, and they all appear at the same height.
Leonardo also cleverly separated the
figures into groups of three that helped create areas of interest, and it also
helped to create individual scenes of drama and movement that helped draw the
viewer into the painting but at the same time draw the eye towards the central
figure of Christ. Instead, in Castagno’s
work the eye is drawn to the central figure of Christ through the framing of
the colorful marble panels and the lines on the ceiling and the lines of the floor
tiles. Movement of the eye relies more
on the decorative elements within the piece rather than the figures
themselves. There is very much a use of
geometric shapes and patterns, which can be seen decorating the floor, walls,
and the ceiling.
There are definitely
strong classical elements that can be found throughout both paintings. In Castagno’s painting the scene of the Last
Supper is placed in a palacial home with marble panels (which remind me of the
painted marble panels found in Roman homes during the Early Empire period)
lining the walls and is riddled with Roman motifs. Some of the motifs include a geometric frieze
that runs above the panels, the sphinxes that flank the disciples, the urns
which are carved into the benches, and the appearance of what look almost like
columns at the end of the walls, which are decorated with acanthus leaves at
the top. The figures are wearing Roman
style clothing, which doesn’t seem to be the case with all of the figures in
Leonardo’s painting. In his painting we
see the use of the arch above Jesus’s head and it helps form an architectural
halo and replaces the use of the round halos that can still be seen in
Castagno’s painting.
There is an interest
in modeling in both paintings. In
Castagno’s painting there is modeling done on the figures in the area of the
head, neck, arms, and in the drapery of the clothing. In Leonardo’s painting we see the modeling
taken a step further, which is a characteristic of the High Renaissance
period. He uses shading extensively on
the figures to make them more realistic and he uses sfumato, which means smoky,
which is shading that gives the affect of haze and creates subtle transitions
of light and dark in the shading.
The composition is
very stable and balanced in Castagno’s Last Supper and with the disciples
balanced on either side of Christ, and the figure of St. John and Judas help to
form a triangular shape in the center around Christ that was common in work
from the Early Renaissance. Leonardo’s
work shows Christ balanced as well with an equal number of figures on both
sides of him. He also forms a natural
triangular shape in the center of the picture, instead of the pyramidal shape
which come to characterize the High Renaissance period.
Linear perspective
was used in the orthogonal lines in the rafters of Leonardo’s painting and
there is a suggestion of atmospheric perspective in the background through the
windows we can see that the mountains appear smoky and further in the
distance. In the other painting, there
is some linear perspective in the lines of the ceiling tiles, but the lines of
the orthogonals don’t converge into a single point. There isn’t any atmospheric perspective, the
only windows in the scene face to the side and the background is filled with a
brick wall which prevents any view into any scenery.
In summary, Castagno’s
“Last Supper” utilizes some of the styles of the Early Renaissance with the use
of Classical elements, the use of modeling and an interest in naturalism with
the figures, the triangular composition that is balanced with the central
figure of Christ in the middle, and the attempt at some linear
perspective. Leonardo’s “Last Supper” is
share some similar characteristics of the triangular balanced composition, the
use of linear perspective, and the use of modeling. His painting, though, shows the dynamic unity
of energetic and expressive figures to create interesting movement within the
picture.
No comments:
Post a Comment