The Baroque
period of the 17th century incorporates some of the ideals of the
Renaissance period, but not all of them.
By comparing Bernini’s sculpture of “David”, which gives a sense of some
of the Baroque characteristics of drama and emotion, and a sense of movement,
with Michelangelo’s “David”, we can get a sense of Renaissance characteristics
and those that define the Baroque period.
In
Michelangelo’s “David” we can see the Renaissance period’s interest in
Classicism and in Humanism, balance of form, naturalism, and idealism. David’s naked form is posed in the
contrapposto stance and bears a similar composition to the “Spearbearer”. Both bear weight on their right leg, which is
fairly straight, while the other leg is relaxed and bent slightly back. The right arm hangs loose and relaxed
straight along the body, while the other arm is bent. Michelangelo’s David seems still. The composition is fairly vertical and
balanced with the relaxed appendages balancing out active ones. The lines of the body, the legs and the
figure’s right arm form fairly straight lines.
There are a few slight vertical lines with the figure’s left leg, the
bent arm and the angle of the jaw, which is shown in profile. The body is frontally orientated, with just
the head twisted and shown in profile.
There’s an
interest in naturalism. Michelangelo has
carefully rendered the muscles and tendons on David’s arms, stomach, legs, and
neck. He even idealized the figure by
making the figure older than Donatello’s figure of David. Instead of a youth, we see a young man at the
prime of life, who is healthy looking with very defined muscles, even in the
groin muscles (which couldn’t naturally get so defined), no wrinkles, scars, or
flaws.
Bernini’s
sculpture of “David” still shows an interest in humanism, an interest in the
human form, and an interest in naturalism, but we see much more interest in the
Baroque style of drama and motion rather than the interest in visual
harmony. His figure, like
Michelangelo’s, depicts a young man in peak physical condition. There is an interest in naturalism of the
Renaissance period, which can be seen in the defined muscles of the leg,
stomach, and arms. The very defined
muscles suggest some idealized rendering, but there is also more of an interest
in naturalism than in Michelangelo’s David.
Bernini depicts the tense lines of the furrowed brow and the lines that
can be seen under the eyes, and the hair that looks disheveled by the wind. He also shows an interest in the different
textures of the hair, the smooth skin, the small sack, and the drapery of cloth,
and the scaling of the garment at David’s feet.
In
composition Bernini’s David is drastically different from Michelangelo’s
David. Instead of the Renaissance’s
interest in balanced composition and depicting a David that is thinking and
contemplating his next move before taking action, Bernini’s David is a dramatic
twisting form that is at the peak moment of action, a Baroque characteristic. The sense of drama is strengthened by the use
of strong diagonal lines formed from the leg going back and the arm that is
reaching down on the figure’s right side.
There aren’t the straight vertical lines like there are in
Michelangelo’s figure, instead there is a dramatic twisting of the hips, arms
and shoulders, with the neck twisting in the opposite direction of the
shoulders. There is an active sense of
tensed action and movement, and because the figure isn’t frontally aligned, it
encourages viewer interaction by encouraging the viewer to look at the figure
from other angles and move around the body, another characteristic of the
Baroque period. Another characteristic
that encourages viewer participation is that the figure seems to step forward
with his front leg into the viewer’s space and the rock, according to the
figure’s gaze, seems to be intended for someone standing behind the viewer.
By
comparing Michelangelo’s David from the Renaissance period with Bernini’s David
from the Baroque period, the viewer can get a sense of Renaissance ideals that
were still incorporated in the Baroque period, along with the characteristics
that define the Baroque period. We can
see the incorporation of the Renaissance ideals of humanism, naturalism, and
some idealism. From Bernini’s statue, we
can see the Baroque period’s interest to show even more naturalism through the
lines around the eyes and the interest in texture. We can also see the interest in drama and
movement instead of visual harmony.
Bernini’s figure also encourages viewer interaction, which is in keeping
with the Counter-Reformation guidelines for art of the Roman Catholic Church.
I really enjoyed reading your post. I think that with all the action and drama behind it, Bernini's David is so much more interesting to look at than Michelangelo's David. Like you have mentioned, the different textures in Bernini's David show us that Baroque artists concentrated much more on the humanism and naturalism of their work than the Renaissance artists.
ReplyDeleteI personally think that Michelangelo's David is more interesting to look at...I agree that Bernini's David incorporates more action and movement, but all of that at once diverts my eye away from it, like my first reaction is a sense of being overwhelmed. Looking at the relaxed and naturally alluring pose of Michelangelo's David sparks my attention and makes me want to look over every detail; there is a flow about his form that pulls my eye along the whole path of his body. Pretty intense.
ReplyDeleteIt's comparisons like this that make me love art history. It is so interesting to see how artistic periods are different and similar and why those changes came about. The mix of religion and personal style of Bernini's David makes it the more interesting of the two (to me at least). He used the biblical imagery demanded of the time, and I'm sure of the man who commissioned this, but added his own touches such as a self portrait with his face being David's.
ReplyDeleteI have to agree with Emily. Bernini's David Doesn't do it for me. I enjoy the fact that he tries to esentually include me into the action but I almost feel that without having Goliath on the other side of the room, its incomplete.
ReplyDelete