Stylization in two works of art, the mosaic of “ Justinian,
Archbishop Maximianus of Ravenna and Attendants in San Vitale” and the “Virgin
and Child with Saints and Angels” during the Byzantine period.
There is a
shift to more stylization and a movement away from the naturalism that was seen
in ancient Roman art. Stylization of the
figure and the landscape is very prevalent in Byzantine art. While there are still some aspects of
naturalism that are present, such as the use of some mottling, realism becomes
less of a focus for Byzantine artists.
Instead, there is a focus on spirituality and the use of icons, which
are representations of holy figures and events.
Icons were important to the Byzantines, except to the iconoclasts, and
they thought that by honoring an icon of a spiritual figure that honor was then
passed on to the actual figure itself.
These icons, along with the artwork found in churches, give a
representation of the stylization in artwork produced during the Byzantine era.
There is a
rigid styles that is noticeable in Byzantine art and can be seen in the
representation of the figures and by looking at the landscape behind the
figures. Looking at the human front
figures in the “Virgin and Child with Saints and Angels” (Stokstad p. 245),
they appear stiff and rigid. Mary is
holding her body very upright in her throne and her posture is a very frontal
pose. Both the saints flanking her on
both sides, share her same stiff straight posture and frontal view. The angels behind the frontal figures seem to
breaking away from this view, adding a contrast from the main figures in front,
and seem to be looking at the hand, or the representation of God, coming from
the sky. The same stiffness in the body
can be seen in the figures of Justinian with the bishop, attendants, and
soldiers (Stokstad p. 240). There is a
slight suggestion of the contropposto stance with Justinian and the other
figures. We can see one foot is in front
of the other and one foot is turned to the side. The stance can be seen even better in the
bent knee of the saints next to Mary.
Even with so much stylization done with the figures, there are still
some visible attempts at realism, and Roman influence, but it is no longer the
main focus for Byzantine art.
The elongated figures is a
stylization found throughout much of the Byzantine art. In the figure of Justinian, we can see that
his body is very long in comparison to the size of his head and his shoulders. His face along with the other figures in the
scene share a long narrow face with long narrow noses. The hands holding the dish are also elongated
unnaturally along with the feet. This
same elongation in the face can be seen in the icon of Mary and in the faces of
the saints and angels. The faces also
show a two-dimensional quality that can be seen in the outline of the eyes and
the dark eyebrows. The cheeks on all the
figures of Justinian and his attendants are unnaturally pink and flush. There is some individualization of the faces
in both sets of artwork. We can see a
change in hair and the appearance of beards in some figures, but overall the features
of eyes and eyebrows remain similar in the different faces. The robes of that Justinian wears, along with
his other attendants, are very much stylized.
There is no longer the interest in the verism and naturalism that was
seen in the Roman art, where the garment was a vehichle to show the outline of
the figure beneath the clothing, without actually having them the figure be
nude, instead, the cloth and the garments are more of a focus than the body
underneath. The emphasis is more on the
lavish quality of the material and using it as a symbolism of wealth and/or
royalty. The purple robe of Justinian
symbolizes wealth, because it was so expensive to make the dye, and we know he
is a royal figure because of the purple robe and his red shoes. The possibility that the robe Mary is wearing
in the iconograh is purple, instead of blue, symbolizes Mary as the veil for
Christ and the red shoes proclaim her status as empress.
The mixture of two-dimensional
quality and three-dimensional characteristics can be seen in the landscape and
the backgrounds. In the mosaic of
Justinian, the ground is suggested by the expanse of green that is mostly one
color. The background is filled in with
one solid tone of gold, which is a stylization that is very prominent in many
works of art from the Byzantines. There
are only slight hints of naturalism with the pillars in the background, which
show some mottling, but overall the affect is of a two-dimensional world, where
the figures don’t seem to be quite standing on solid ground. Gold backgrounds symbolized divinity and
spirituality, along with reflecting wealth, status, and prestige. These backgrounds were not meant to show
depth or realism, but instead seem to focus on creating a two-dimensional other
worldly realm not of this world. Gold is
also used for the halos around the faces of Mary and the saints, and of
Justinian. They are of a solid color and
symbolize the holiness and spirituality of the figures, and the association
with royalty.
The Byzantine artists were more
focused on the naturalism of their art but instead they were interested in the
symbolism and spirituality of their subject matter, and less on trying to
create a naturalistic world. They did
use some slight mottling and some shading and the use of the contropposto
stance in some figures, but for the most part their figures were kept two
dimensional with the outlining of the bodies, around the eyes, and the
unnatural positioning of the feet that give the figures the appearance of
floating in space. The two-dimensional
aspect is brought into the landscape and the background with the use of a solid
gold sky, which has rich symbolism but no depth.
You are right that we sometimes do see some modeling in Byzantine mosaics and paintings. I'm glad that you mentioned that, since there occasionally are features in Byzantine art that are naturalistic.
ReplyDelete-Prof. Bowen
I like your perspective of the clothing in "Emperor Justinian and His Attendants," I was hoping there would at least be some hinting of the figure underneath the cloth, like some works include a little indication of naturalism, but he and his attendants' bodies/poses are so static and frontal, so I can appreciate how the drapery done can show the quality of the material, and in return, how wealthy/important the figures must be to have this kind of quality clothing. This was a nice read!
ReplyDelete